I find myself thinking about CONNECTIONS a lot these days - probably because I feel I'm not very connected right now...
When I started my doctoral program in July 2009, I was looking forward to a new set of colleagues, new horizons opening, intellectual stimulation and challenge, and new connections. What I didn't stop to think about was how this endeavor would impact the life I had built and enjoyed up to that point.
In June of 2010, I was named Social Worker of the Year by NASW-MN, my professional association (National Association of Social Workers). It was, by any measure, the highest honor I have ever been given. I'm still not entirely confident I "deserved" it - but my colleagues insist that yes, I did. Since then, I have stepped away from not only my contract work with NASW-MN, but also all volunteer work. I used to keep myself busy upwards of 40 hrs/week with my involvements and leadership posts. Now, even though Social Work Day at the Capitol (SW-DAC) was my "baby" for 8 years - I revitalized the annual lobby day and increased attendance by over four-fold during that time - I couldn't even tell you what day it's scheduled for in 2012... and that makes me sad. I trained an AMAZING young social worker to take over for me, and while she continues to do a bang-up job, I miss it. A lot. I can't remember the last time I was at the NASW-MN office, or even on the website - the website that I scrapped, totally revamped, and maintained for 4 years. Hard work - and I miss it all.
I also stepped away from Exultate in March of 2010 - the semi-professional chamber choir I had sung with since 1997. My mother tells me I have been singing since before I could talk, so therefore, I can honestly claim I've been a musician all my life. I miss singing - it helps me keep my pieces together. And I miss my Exultate family - I have sung with amazing, and amazingly gifted people!
Although I adore and cherish my cohort mates (Cohort 23 ROCKS!), I don't see them enough. In fact, we haven't been together as a cohort since mid-May 2011... that's a long time. I miss them, too, and can barely contain my excitement at seeing them on February 10th!
On the surface, it should be easy to connect with my friends, since my schedule during the day is completely flexible between 9-4. But, people are busy, they have jobs, they have appointments, they have their own kids and commitments.... so Facebook became my primary connection to the world - only...
Well, lets just say there's a difference of opinion about Facebook in my household. (!) So, that's gone now, too. And I miss my friends. A lot.
Funny how we sometimes don't realize how connected we actually are, until those connections are gone. And I'm certainly feeling it.
So, if you're in the Twin Cities Metro and looking for a lunch companion, let me know! Or, if you have an hour & want to meet for coffee - I'm your gal! 2012 is going to be a year of POSITIVE CHANGE for me - including in the area of connections, so let me know if you want to CONNECT!!
Thoughts from a Progressive Liberal Social Worker
This is me... a progressive liberal social worker that considers the late Senator Paul Wellstone to be one of the great heroes of our society. This is what I think about the crazy world we find ourselves in! I'm also a MOM of twin daughters (conceived via IVF), a singer, a wife, a crafter, a daughter, a reader, a doctoral student, a tree hugger... and a myriad other "things." Welcome to my world!
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Friday, January 13, 2012
Leaving 2011... and Entering 2012
According to the popular mythos regarding the Mayan calender, 2012 will be the end of the world as we know it. Personally, I choose to accept the traditional understanding - that 2012 will be a time of massive change and renewal, with our world emerging in very different form. If you believe critical theorists such as Jurgen Habermas and David Harvey (thank you, Ed.D. program!), we have been in a time of critical change for a while now, and where we currently are is already somewhere beyond post-modernism.
As for me, what I know is that 2011 was difficult. BEYOND difficult. I am still so exhausted that the thought of starting the required reading for spring semester - my final cohort course - literally makes me sick to my stomach or starts an anxiety attack. Here's what my year looked like:
So. Back to 2012. My plan for this year, as I continue to sit uncomfortably with all that is left over from 2011, is to be kind to myself...
... give myself grace when I don't meet my Type-A personality, perfectionist, higher-than-high standards.
... be okay with a B in my final cohort course. After all, as a colleague reminded me this week, B's earn doctorates, too!
... enjoy the time I am able to spend with my parents, my husband and my family - even if it's not nearly enough... because it never is. I will volunteer in my daughters' classrooms again, and visit my parents as often as feasible.
... take care of my body! Get my hair colored professionally (I've never invested in my hair), get routine pedicures (for my disgustingly dry feet), and work out regularly (weight loss? Yes!).
... read some Really Good Books - fiction, that have been gathering dust on my night table for too long!
... and SING. Yes, I will sing again in 2012!! It's been 2 years too long. It's time.
I will embrace 2012 as a year of immense, radical change - regardless of the outcome of my CLR, or my Dad's battle with cancer, or anything else the world decides to throw at me. I don't think of these things as resolutions, or even goals - they must be part of LIFE.
And life is definitely worth living.
As for me, what I know is that 2011 was difficult. BEYOND difficult. I am still so exhausted that the thought of starting the required reading for spring semester - my final cohort course - literally makes me sick to my stomach or starts an anxiety attack. Here's what my year looked like:
- January: I took J-term and spring semester reading with me on our Caribbean cruise - which I didn't complete because of temporary but severe vision loss caused by the Scopolamine patch for motion sickness. A rare side effect that of course, I experienced.
- Jan/Feb: I endured 6 weeks of post-cruise vertigo and tinnitus - another rare condition typically affecting women over 40 that can last up to 10 years. Thank God mine resolved in weeks.
- February 17: Radical hysterectomy, followed by 6 months of severe insomnia.
- March: Maren completed her 16-week program at The Brain Balance Center, to help with her severe sensory issues. (www.BrainBalanceCenters.com)
- March 14: I started the conversation with the SLP School District re: my highly gifted & talented (G/T) child, for whom starting kindergarten in the fall was completely inappropriate - math at the 2/3rd grade level, and reading at around the 4th.
- Summer session: Developed and completed the pilot project for my dissertation in 6 short weeks
- July 6: Learned Maren had lost significant sight in her right eye, resulting in spending our final weeks of summer doing school work as we patched her eye 2 hrs/day (which she continues).
- July 15: The girls completed preschool!! WOW!!
- Late July: The girls went to a full week of YMCA Day Camp for the first time. Maren also took art & acting classes; Joie took swimming lessons all year.
- July & August: my parents were both diagnosed with CANCER, within 30 days of each other. Mom had her thyroid removed and a single dose of radiation late September. My Dad has been hospitalized three times, had two stents placed, and has lost about 75 pounds. Thankfully, his Stage 4 Pancreatic Cancer seems to be retreating - his tumor continues to shrink, as do most of the spots in his lungs, kidneys & liver.
- Labor Day Weekend: I made the very difficult decision to dis-enroll from my planned fall semester course, pushing off my Ed.D. completion by a full year, in order to spend most of each week with my parents. It looked as if my Dad had only a few weeks left on earth...
- September 8: My daughters started Kindergarten!
- September 18: PurpleRide 2011 - we cheered on my niece & sister's family, riding in honor of Papa Ron.
- October 3: Mom was declared cancer FREE!
- October 8: I planned & pulled off, almost single-handedly, A Celebration of Ron & Jerri's Life Together, honoring my parents' 44-1/2 years of marriage - we didn't think Dad would make it to their 45th anniversary on February 18, 2012. It was well attended and AMAZING.
- October 16: My siblings decided to become more blatant and frequent in their use of me as their emotional punching bag, for all their emotions around my Dad. Unfortunately, as has been my role in my family, I was expected to "fix it." I declined. Respectfully, but firmly. And I carefully considered my options.
- October 17: I called St. Thomas to learn how to be reinstated in my doctoral program.
- October 19: I officially re-registered for my pivotal course at UST, losing 6 weeks of precious writing time.
- October 24: Emergency root canal, following 6 weeks of severe pain (probably caused by stress and grinding my teeth in my sleep).
- October 25: SLP Schools finally tested Johanna - full scale IQ of 138 - they conceded that yes, she is, in fact, a gifted learner.
- November 20: PurpleLight Vigil at the MN State Capitol. It was horrifically cold & Joie got ill, but we honored Papa Ron.
- November 21: Received official word that Johanna would be accelerated, on a trial basis for 6 weeks, to 1st Grade. VICTORY! And it only took 9 months...
- December 3: Maren & Johanna turned 6.
- December 5: Joie started 1st Grade!
- December 10: Double 6s Birthday Party
- December 12: My Dad heard the "R" word! "Your cancer cells are in remission" - WOW! He's not out of the woods, but appears to be beating his "beast"!
- December 19-30: I spent every waking moment, including a final 38-1/2 straight hours without sleep, to finish writing my Critical Literature Review (CLR). I got it done, barely, but I don't have the courage to re-read it yet... and will not find out until February 15th if I have passed. The CLR is the document that accomplishes two Very Important Things:
- green-lights me to start my dissertation (keeping me on track for May 2013 graduation),
- and bestows upon me ABD status - All But Dissertation - which means I qualify to apply for tenure-track faculty positions.
I. AM. TIRED.
So. Back to 2012. My plan for this year, as I continue to sit uncomfortably with all that is left over from 2011, is to be kind to myself...
... give myself grace when I don't meet my Type-A personality, perfectionist, higher-than-high standards.
... be okay with a B in my final cohort course. After all, as a colleague reminded me this week, B's earn doctorates, too!
... enjoy the time I am able to spend with my parents, my husband and my family - even if it's not nearly enough... because it never is. I will volunteer in my daughters' classrooms again, and visit my parents as often as feasible.
... take care of my body! Get my hair colored professionally (I've never invested in my hair), get routine pedicures (for my disgustingly dry feet), and work out regularly (weight loss? Yes!).
... read some Really Good Books - fiction, that have been gathering dust on my night table for too long!
... and SING. Yes, I will sing again in 2012!! It's been 2 years too long. It's time.
I will embrace 2012 as a year of immense, radical change - regardless of the outcome of my CLR, or my Dad's battle with cancer, or anything else the world decides to throw at me. I don't think of these things as resolutions, or even goals - they must be part of LIFE.
And life is definitely worth living.
Monday, November 28, 2011
Giving this another go... Maybe...
After a LENGTHY absence, during which my daughters have somehow turned 6 (this Saturday); I've gotten into graduate school and made it to the dissertation process for my Ed.D. at the University of St. Thomas; we've weathered a MAJOR house remodel; and both my parents have been diagnosed with cancer (Mom's thyroid cancer has been BEATEN - Dad is actively battling pancreatic cancer), I find that I need an outlet uncompensated for. I have no work colleagues, I rarely see my colleagues at UST, my husband isn't interested in politics (or many of my rants!), and Facebook can only go so far...
So. Here I am.
What will I write about? I have no idea. This may be an extended journaling operation - or, I may at times delve deeply into a subject I feel incredibly passionate about and have few/no outlets for. Regardless, Chris has told me for YEARS I'd be an excellent blogger. And I do have a lot on my mind...
So, I guess we'll see where this goes. :)
So. Here I am.
What will I write about? I have no idea. This may be an extended journaling operation - or, I may at times delve deeply into a subject I feel incredibly passionate about and have few/no outlets for. Regardless, Chris has told me for YEARS I'd be an excellent blogger. And I do have a lot on my mind...
So, I guess we'll see where this goes. :)
Tuesday, June 28, 2005
Supreme Court Decision re: Restraining Orders
Hi - sorry it's been a while... I'm pregnant with twins & haven't been feeling well - and, trying to ignore the news and anything remotely political in the interest of healthy babies!
HOWEVER, I heard something on public radio this morning that made this social worker's blood boil. In case you missed it, the Supreme Court had their last session of the "year" yesterday, Monday, June 27th. One of the decisions was in regards to a person's ability to sue the police when a valid restraining order is not enforced by same police department. This case stemmed from a situation in Colorado where a woman's three children were murdered by her estranged husband after he kidnapped them from her front yard and allegedly took them to a Denver amusement park, and in which the local police did not alert the Denver police or have the amusement park searched for the man and children. (Castle Rock, Colo., v. Gonzales, 04-278)
"Jessica Gonzales did not have a constitutional right to police enforcement of the court order against her husband", the court said in a 7-2 opinion. Further, Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, said, "The creation of a personal entitlement to something as vague and novel as enforcement of restraining orders cannot 'simply go without saying.' We conclude that Colorado has not created such an entitlement.''
WHAT THE HELL?! Here's the rant: so tell my why on earth we have such a thing as OFP's (Orders for Protection) and restraining orders, if the person who legally requests and receives one from a judge cannot reasonably expect police enforcement of said legal order?! Seems to me this completely strips away the very limited options that abused women (and their children) have to stay somewhat safe from their abusers. Most abused women already won't stick their necks out in a courthouse to request said OFP's & restraining orders, because it would require them to come into contact with their abuser at the courthouse - can you imagine the impact this ruling will have on their future choices?!
Now, I have to point out that there were two lone voices of reason in this decision. Justice John Paul Stevens was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in dissenting this decision (note: the ONLY woman on the bench!). Justice Stevens wrote in his dissent that the woman's "description of the police behavior in this case and the department's callous policy of failing to respond properly to reports of restraining order violations clearly alleges a due process violation.''
I simply cannot fathom this. Further evidence of male domination and the squashing of women and children's rights... and I'm not a firm believer in systemic misogyny!
It's also worth mentioning that the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) has been pending reauthorization in Congress this year, and, as of today, has only been introduced in the Senate. It not only has to make it's way not only through both Houses of Congress, but also must first pass through the Senate Judiciary Committee. Don't know much about VAWA? Check out this link - the good folks at Wellstone Action! have an entire portion of their website devoted to educating people about VAWA and tracking the bill as it moves through Congress:
http://www.wellstone.org/swinstitute/category_page.aspx?catID=3800
If VAWA interests you - contact your Congressional representation in Washington and urge them to sign on as co-authors of VAWA and work to get it passed.
Well, that's my rant for today. Maybe I'll be back in the blog business, since this has really rattled my cage. Also, our state goverment in MN is set to shut down at midnight thursday, since our fabulous Governor (President Bush's golden boy, I might add) is NOT budging even a centimeter on his infamous "no new taxes" pledge... THAT ought to give me something to rant about in the month of July!
Oh - and Happy 35th Birthday to me! :)
HOWEVER, I heard something on public radio this morning that made this social worker's blood boil. In case you missed it, the Supreme Court had their last session of the "year" yesterday, Monday, June 27th. One of the decisions was in regards to a person's ability to sue the police when a valid restraining order is not enforced by same police department. This case stemmed from a situation in Colorado where a woman's three children were murdered by her estranged husband after he kidnapped them from her front yard and allegedly took them to a Denver amusement park, and in which the local police did not alert the Denver police or have the amusement park searched for the man and children. (Castle Rock, Colo., v. Gonzales, 04-278)
"Jessica Gonzales did not have a constitutional right to police enforcement of the court order against her husband", the court said in a 7-2 opinion. Further, Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, said, "The creation of a personal entitlement to something as vague and novel as enforcement of restraining orders cannot 'simply go without saying.' We conclude that Colorado has not created such an entitlement.''
WHAT THE HELL?! Here's the rant: so tell my why on earth we have such a thing as OFP's (Orders for Protection) and restraining orders, if the person who legally requests and receives one from a judge cannot reasonably expect police enforcement of said legal order?! Seems to me this completely strips away the very limited options that abused women (and their children) have to stay somewhat safe from their abusers. Most abused women already won't stick their necks out in a courthouse to request said OFP's & restraining orders, because it would require them to come into contact with their abuser at the courthouse - can you imagine the impact this ruling will have on their future choices?!
Now, I have to point out that there were two lone voices of reason in this decision. Justice John Paul Stevens was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in dissenting this decision (note: the ONLY woman on the bench!). Justice Stevens wrote in his dissent that the woman's "description of the police behavior in this case and the department's callous policy of failing to respond properly to reports of restraining order violations clearly alleges a due process violation.''
I simply cannot fathom this. Further evidence of male domination and the squashing of women and children's rights... and I'm not a firm believer in systemic misogyny!
It's also worth mentioning that the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) has been pending reauthorization in Congress this year, and, as of today, has only been introduced in the Senate. It not only has to make it's way not only through both Houses of Congress, but also must first pass through the Senate Judiciary Committee. Don't know much about VAWA? Check out this link - the good folks at Wellstone Action! have an entire portion of their website devoted to educating people about VAWA and tracking the bill as it moves through Congress:
http://www.wellstone.org/swinstitute/category_page.aspx?catID=3800
If VAWA interests you - contact your Congressional representation in Washington and urge them to sign on as co-authors of VAWA and work to get it passed.
Well, that's my rant for today. Maybe I'll be back in the blog business, since this has really rattled my cage. Also, our state goverment in MN is set to shut down at midnight thursday, since our fabulous Governor (President Bush's golden boy, I might add) is NOT budging even a centimeter on his infamous "no new taxes" pledge... THAT ought to give me something to rant about in the month of July!
Oh - and Happy 35th Birthday to me! :)
Wednesday, April 20, 2005
"Welfare Healthcare" in MN
Here's a wonderful idea: develop a low-cost health insurance program, run by the state, for low-income working adults and their dependents. Sound like a good one? Well, it is - it's called MNCare - and THOUSANDS of people in the state of Minnesota over the last decade have saved the state BILLIONS of dollars by having preventative healthcare coverage.
MNCare was designed to prevent their other option: wait until they're so sick they need emergency care, so they go to the emergency room and need (and are provided) far more intensive diagnostic services, most likely an expensive hospital stay, and expensive aftercare and medications. All of this, by the way, the "community" hospital is required by federal law to cover if the patient can't afford it or they don't qualify for Medicaid or Medicare. These costs also get passed on to the hospital's other patients in the form of really high healthcare costs. And, since a lot of hospitals now own HMO's (or vice versa), our health insurance costs also go up.
Don't believe me? I worked in one of the largest Midwestern teaching hospitals for 4 years, on the largest adolescent psychiatric unit in a 5-state region. Trust me - I saw it happen nearly every day.
So anyway - why am I all fired up about MNCare, if it's such a marvelous thing? Well, here in MN we have a republican governor (Tim Pawlenty - you may have heard of him - he's apparently one of the rising stars in the GOP), who took a "no new taxes" pledge when pressured by his right-wing wealthy cronies at the Taxpayers League. He has not only single-handedly (okay, with the help of our republican-dominated state House) dismantled our progressive, nationally recognized system of taking care of the people of our state (otherwise known as social or safety-net programs). To balance the budget without raising taxes, he has cut and cut and CUT funding to health & human services programs, closely followed by our education system.
His new proposal is to tighten the criteria to qualify for MNCare - which he has loudly proclaimed to be "welfare healthcare." This proposal would effectively cut 27,000 working adults and their dependents off the program. I remind you: these are working adults, merely taking advantage of a program that was specifically designed for them, to save the state billions of dollars! Now, to top it off, the republican chair of the House Health Committee (Rep. Fran Bradley) has proposed a bill that would knock another 2,700 off the program! (I know, when you're talking thousands, what's a few more, right?!)
So there it is. "Welfare healthcare." Another well-planned and implemented social program, that is doing exactly what it was intended to do (dual purposes, actually), branded negatively and being dismantled by the almighty "I pulled myself up by my bootstraps so why the hell can't you" crowd... And THAT'S why I'm so fired up today!
MNCare was designed to prevent their other option: wait until they're so sick they need emergency care, so they go to the emergency room and need (and are provided) far more intensive diagnostic services, most likely an expensive hospital stay, and expensive aftercare and medications. All of this, by the way, the "community" hospital is required by federal law to cover if the patient can't afford it or they don't qualify for Medicaid or Medicare. These costs also get passed on to the hospital's other patients in the form of really high healthcare costs. And, since a lot of hospitals now own HMO's (or vice versa), our health insurance costs also go up.
Don't believe me? I worked in one of the largest Midwestern teaching hospitals for 4 years, on the largest adolescent psychiatric unit in a 5-state region. Trust me - I saw it happen nearly every day.
So anyway - why am I all fired up about MNCare, if it's such a marvelous thing? Well, here in MN we have a republican governor (Tim Pawlenty - you may have heard of him - he's apparently one of the rising stars in the GOP), who took a "no new taxes" pledge when pressured by his right-wing wealthy cronies at the Taxpayers League. He has not only single-handedly (okay, with the help of our republican-dominated state House) dismantled our progressive, nationally recognized system of taking care of the people of our state (otherwise known as social or safety-net programs). To balance the budget without raising taxes, he has cut and cut and CUT funding to health & human services programs, closely followed by our education system.
His new proposal is to tighten the criteria to qualify for MNCare - which he has loudly proclaimed to be "welfare healthcare." This proposal would effectively cut 27,000 working adults and their dependents off the program. I remind you: these are working adults, merely taking advantage of a program that was specifically designed for them, to save the state billions of dollars! Now, to top it off, the republican chair of the House Health Committee (Rep. Fran Bradley) has proposed a bill that would knock another 2,700 off the program! (I know, when you're talking thousands, what's a few more, right?!)
So there it is. "Welfare healthcare." Another well-planned and implemented social program, that is doing exactly what it was intended to do (dual purposes, actually), branded negatively and being dismantled by the almighty "I pulled myself up by my bootstraps so why the hell can't you" crowd... And THAT'S why I'm so fired up today!
Tuesday, April 19, 2005
The swing to Conservatism
This is really a response to Greg's comments (see Virgin Voyage)...
I am really troubled with the swing to conservatism, and was actually having a conversation along these lines about the time you were typing your thoughts... I struggle when I know intelligent, good people that truly and deeply care about the people in their communities, and/or care about having green trees & blue skies & healthy green spaces, and firmly believe in "all men were created equal" - yet they choose to vote for very powerful and charismatic people that absolutely do not share these beliefs, or at least prove that they do by passing laws congruent with those beliefs! It makes no rational sense to me - and I can only assume that people are lulled into complacency and CHOOSE to believe that they are not being lied to.
Re: Christianity - my own faith is deeply personal, but I also have a pretty hard time with the whole concept of "faith" (i.e., it's hard to walk off the edge of the proverbial cliff and trust that God's going to take care of me, and that He'll "work all things for good..."). So, looking for a smiling me isn't always going to reassure someone that I trust I'm going to Heaven when I die! I do believe that God allows us to have knowledge when we, as a race, can mostly handle it. This kind of ties into your (Greg's) philosophy of revelationary, I think? But I also firmly believe that the Bible is the true, inspired Word of God, and that it must be understood within the cultural and historical time in which is was written - and that is the step that most Christians miss.
I can guess that this is where a lot of the current trend toward conservatism is coming from, along with the fact that people are truly fearful of things they don't understand (the human condition). It's simply much easier to hide behind a grey area of the Bible than to do the very hard work of figuring out how God's word really fits into our modern society.
Bush flat out scares me - PERIOD. As a mental health practitioner, he strikes me as diagnosably narcissistic, and this type of person can be extremely dangerous. And, he's the leader of the free world, who is convinced he is ordained by God to be leader, and therefore all his decisions must therefore be blessed by God, right?! SCARY doesn't even begin to cover it...
As for our new Pope, Benedict XVI - apparently he's going to pick up right where John Paul II left off, and I didn't expect anything more than that from the conclave... His philosophy is literally all these men know! Think about it - JPII is the only Pope that I can remember in my lifetime, and he served one of the longest papacies ever. He was well-liked and well-spoken, and yet he ruled with an iron fist. I can hope and pray for a Pope more "in tune" with our modern world when we go through this again in the next 5-10 years (because, face it, Benedict XVI won't live forever)...
I am really troubled with the swing to conservatism, and was actually having a conversation along these lines about the time you were typing your thoughts... I struggle when I know intelligent, good people that truly and deeply care about the people in their communities, and/or care about having green trees & blue skies & healthy green spaces, and firmly believe in "all men were created equal" - yet they choose to vote for very powerful and charismatic people that absolutely do not share these beliefs, or at least prove that they do by passing laws congruent with those beliefs! It makes no rational sense to me - and I can only assume that people are lulled into complacency and CHOOSE to believe that they are not being lied to.
Re: Christianity - my own faith is deeply personal, but I also have a pretty hard time with the whole concept of "faith" (i.e., it's hard to walk off the edge of the proverbial cliff and trust that God's going to take care of me, and that He'll "work all things for good..."). So, looking for a smiling me isn't always going to reassure someone that I trust I'm going to Heaven when I die! I do believe that God allows us to have knowledge when we, as a race, can mostly handle it. This kind of ties into your (Greg's) philosophy of revelationary, I think? But I also firmly believe that the Bible is the true, inspired Word of God, and that it must be understood within the cultural and historical time in which is was written - and that is the step that most Christians miss.
I can guess that this is where a lot of the current trend toward conservatism is coming from, along with the fact that people are truly fearful of things they don't understand (the human condition). It's simply much easier to hide behind a grey area of the Bible than to do the very hard work of figuring out how God's word really fits into our modern society.
Bush flat out scares me - PERIOD. As a mental health practitioner, he strikes me as diagnosably narcissistic, and this type of person can be extremely dangerous. And, he's the leader of the free world, who is convinced he is ordained by God to be leader, and therefore all his decisions must therefore be blessed by God, right?! SCARY doesn't even begin to cover it...
As for our new Pope, Benedict XVI - apparently he's going to pick up right where John Paul II left off, and I didn't expect anything more than that from the conclave... His philosophy is literally all these men know! Think about it - JPII is the only Pope that I can remember in my lifetime, and he served one of the longest papacies ever. He was well-liked and well-spoken, and yet he ruled with an iron fist. I can hope and pray for a Pope more "in tune" with our modern world when we go through this again in the next 5-10 years (because, face it, Benedict XVI won't live forever)...
Monday, April 18, 2005
Virgin Voyage
My husband has been after me to start blogging, mostly because he gets a little tired of all my ranting and raving about the state of our society here in America. I'm a masters-level clinical social worker that has chosen to move into "macro-level practice" (to the non-social work world, that means no individual client contact, but more "big picture" stuff), and focus on social justice, politics, and all things policy-related.
I'm uniquely positioned to provide interesting view-points on the world: I was raised in the Evangelical Christian church (and the Republican Party!) and yes, consider myself to be one of those "born-again Christians"; I hold both bachelor's and master's degrees in social work and have worked in the field of adolescent mental health for more than a dozen years; I'm a die-hard Progressive Liberal Democrat and worked on Senator Wellstone's last campaign; and, I'm a happily married heterosexual woman that is firmly allied with the gay community, having several dear friends and family members in the GLBT community. I guess I'm kind of an enigma of sorts, actually - I can see the world from a lot of different angles, but am quite thoughtful and knowledgeable about where I choose to come down on the issues.
So, here we go. It'll be interesting to put my ideas down where someone - anyone, really, can read them! Things like, oh, the Terry Shaivo case that about drove me out of my mind (let the woman die in peace, for pete's sake!!); the same-sex marriage debate that we can't seem to let go of here in Minnesota (what's being threatened, anyway?! aren't divorce rates over 50%?!); and Tom DeLay's strange idea that being an unethical politician is okay and somehow fits into his strong "moral values" that won both him and Bush their seats again last fall (and made me nauseous for weeks on end)! Maybe someone out there will actually appreciate my rantings?!
I'm uniquely positioned to provide interesting view-points on the world: I was raised in the Evangelical Christian church (and the Republican Party!) and yes, consider myself to be one of those "born-again Christians"; I hold both bachelor's and master's degrees in social work and have worked in the field of adolescent mental health for more than a dozen years; I'm a die-hard Progressive Liberal Democrat and worked on Senator Wellstone's last campaign; and, I'm a happily married heterosexual woman that is firmly allied with the gay community, having several dear friends and family members in the GLBT community. I guess I'm kind of an enigma of sorts, actually - I can see the world from a lot of different angles, but am quite thoughtful and knowledgeable about where I choose to come down on the issues.
So, here we go. It'll be interesting to put my ideas down where someone - anyone, really, can read them! Things like, oh, the Terry Shaivo case that about drove me out of my mind (let the woman die in peace, for pete's sake!!); the same-sex marriage debate that we can't seem to let go of here in Minnesota (what's being threatened, anyway?! aren't divorce rates over 50%?!); and Tom DeLay's strange idea that being an unethical politician is okay and somehow fits into his strong "moral values" that won both him and Bush their seats again last fall (and made me nauseous for weeks on end)! Maybe someone out there will actually appreciate my rantings?!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)